Chapter 10
25 min read
Section 69 of 175

Delta Method

Fundamental Theorems

Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  1. Understand the fundamental idea of the Delta Method: using Taylor expansion to approximate the variance of a function of random variables.
  2. Apply the univariate Delta Method to derive asymptotic distributions and construct confidence intervals for transformed estimators.
  3. Extend to the multivariate case using gradients and covariance matrices for functions of multiple random variables.
  4. Recognize when the first-order approximation fails and apply the second-order Delta Method when g(μ)=0g'(\mu) = 0.
  5. Implement Delta Method calculations in Python for practical statistical inference problems.
  6. Connect the Delta Method to deep learning: understand error propagation, uncertainty quantification, and Fisher information.
Why This Matters for AI/ML Engineers: Every time you transform a prediction (e.g., apply softmax, sigmoid, or log), you change the uncertainty. The Delta Method tells you exactly how variance propagates through nonlinear transformations. This is essential for uncertainty quantification, calibrated predictions, and understanding gradient flow in neural networks. It also connects directly to Fisher information and the Cramér-Rao bound.

The Story: Propagating Uncertainty Through Transformations

The Problem We Need to Solve

Suppose you estimate that a coin has probability p^=0.6\hat{p} = 0.6 of landing heads, with standard error SE(p^)=0.05\text{SE}(\hat{p}) = 0.05. Now you want to know the odds:

odds=p1p\text{odds} = \frac{p}{1-p}

The estimated odds are 0.60.4=1.5\frac{0.6}{0.4} = 1.5. But what is the standard error of the odds? This is a nonlinear function of p^\hat{p}. You cannot simply plug in the SE of p^\hat{p}.

This is exactly the problem the Delta Method solves: given the distribution of θ^\hat{\theta}, approximate the distribution of g(θ^)g(\hat{\theta}) for any differentiable function gg.

Historical Context

The Delta Method is a classical technique dating back to the early 20th century, closely related to the work of R.A. Fisher on maximum likelihood estimation. The name "Delta Method" comes from the notation Δ\Delta traditionally used for small changes or deviations.

Key Insight: The Delta Method is essentially error propagation for statisticians. Engineers call it "propagation of uncertainty"; physicists call it "error analysis." The mathematics is the same: use the derivative to linearize the transformation locally.

Building Intuition: Linearization

The Delta Method's power comes from a simple idea: near the mean, any smooth function is approximately linear. This is the essence of Taylor expansion.

For a differentiable function gg, the first-order Taylor expansion around μ\mu is:

g(x)g(μ)+g(μ)(xμ)g(x) \approx g(\mu) + g'(\mu)(x - \mu)

If XX is a random variable with mean μ\mu and small variance, then XX is usually close to μ\mu, so the linear approximation is accurate.

The Core Logic:
  1. Near μ\mu, the function g(x)g(x) behaves like a straight line
  2. For a linear function h(x)=a+bxh(x) = a + bx, we have Var(h(X))=b2Var(X)\text{Var}(h(X)) = b^2 \text{Var}(X)
  3. Therefore: Var(g(X))[g(μ)]2Var(X)\text{Var}(g(X)) \approx [g'(\mu)]^2 \text{Var}(X)

Interactive: Taylor Approximation

Explore how the first-order Taylor approximation (the tangent line) captures the behavior of various functions near the expansion point:

Key Observation: Notice how the green tangent line closely matches the blue curve near the expansion point μ\mu. This is why the Delta Method works: the sample mean Xˉn\bar{X}_n concentrates around μ\mu as nn \to \infty, so the linear approximation becomes increasingly accurate.

Formal Definition

Univariate Delta Method

Let θ^n\hat{\theta}_n be a sequence of estimators such that:

n(θ^nθ)dN(0,σ2)\sqrt{n}(\hat{\theta}_n - \theta) \xrightarrow{d} N(0, \sigma^2)

This is the Central Limit Theorem setup. Now let gg be a function that is differentiable at θ\theta with g(θ)0g'(\theta) \neq 0. Then:

Theorem (Delta Method):n(g(θ^n)g(θ))dN(0,[g(θ)]2σ2)\sqrt{n}(g(\hat{\theta}_n) - g(\theta)) \xrightarrow{d} N(0, [g'(\theta)]^2 \sigma^2)Equivalently:g(θ^n)approxN(g(θ),[g(θ)]2σ2n)g(\hat{\theta}_n) \stackrel{approx}{\sim} N\left(g(\theta), \frac{[g'(\theta)]^2 \sigma^2}{n}\right)

In practical terms: If you know the asymptotic variance of your estimator, multiply it by the square of the derivative to get the asymptotic variance of the transformed estimator.

Symbol-by-Symbol Breakdown

SymbolMeaningIntuition
θ̂ₙEstimator based on n observationsSample mean, MLE, etc.
θTrue parameter valueWhat we are estimating
σ²Asymptotic variance parameterFrom CLT: typically Var(X)/n for means
gTransformation functionlog, sqrt, exp, odds ratio, etc.
g'(θ)Derivative of g at θMeasures sensitivity of g to changes in θ
[g'(θ)]²σ²Variance of g(θ̂)Key Delta Method result
Why the square? When we linearize g(X)g(μ)+g(μ)(Xμ)g(X) \approx g(\mu) + g'(\mu)(X - \mu), the variance becomes Var(g(μ)(Xμ))=[g(μ)]2Var(X)\text{Var}(g'(\mu)(X - \mu)) = [g'(\mu)]^2 \text{Var}(X). The square of the slope determines how much variance "passes through" the transformation.

Interactive: Variance Propagation

See how the Delta Method predicts the distribution of transformed sample means. Compare the theoretical normal approximation to simulation:


Multivariate Delta Method

In practice, we often have functions of multiple variables. For example, the ratio g(X,Y)=X/Yg(X, Y) = X/Y or the difference g(X,Y)=XYg(X, Y) = X - Y. The Delta Method extends naturally.

The Gradient Formula

Let θ^n=(θ^1,,θ^k)T\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}_n = (\hat{\theta}_1, \ldots, \hat{\theta}_k)^T be a vector of estimators with:

n(θ^nθ)dN(0,Σ)\sqrt{n}(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}_n - \boldsymbol{\theta}) \xrightarrow{d} N(\mathbf{0}, \boldsymbol{\Sigma})

For a differentiable function g:RkRg: \mathbb{R}^k \to \mathbb{R}:

Theorem (Multivariate Delta Method):n(g(θ^n)g(θ))dN(0,g(θ)TΣg(θ))\sqrt{n}(g(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}_n) - g(\boldsymbol{\theta})) \xrightarrow{d} N(0, \nabla g(\boldsymbol{\theta})^T \boldsymbol{\Sigma} \nabla g(\boldsymbol{\theta}))where g=(gθ1,,gθk)T\nabla g = \left(\frac{\partial g}{\partial \theta_1}, \ldots, \frac{\partial g}{\partial \theta_k}\right)^T

The formula in words: The variance of g(θ^)g(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}}) is a quadratic form in the gradient, weighted by the covariance matrix.

Example: Ratio g(x,y)=x/yg(x, y) = x/y
  • Gradient: g=(1/y,x/y2)T\nabla g = (1/y, -x/y^2)^T
  • At (μx,μy)(\mu_x, \mu_y): g=(1/μy,μx/μy2)T\nabla g = (1/\mu_y, -\mu_x/\mu_y^2)^T
  • Variance: Var(XˉYˉ)1μy2Var(Xˉ)+μx2μy4Var(Yˉ)2μxμy3Cov(Xˉ,Yˉ)\text{Var}\left(\frac{\bar{X}}{\bar{Y}}\right) \approx \frac{1}{\mu_y^2} \text{Var}(\bar{X}) + \frac{\mu_x^2}{\mu_y^4} \text{Var}(\bar{Y}) - \frac{2\mu_x}{\mu_y^3} \text{Cov}(\bar{X}, \bar{Y})

Interactive: Multivariate Example

Explore how the Delta Method works for ratio and difference estimators:


Confidence Intervals via Delta Method

One of the most practical applications of the Delta Method is constructing confidence intervals for transformed parameters. The procedure is:

  1. Compute point estimate: g(θ^)g(\hat{\theta})
  2. Compute SE of θ^\hat{\theta}: Usually SE(θ^)=s/n\text{SE}(\hat{\theta}) = s/\sqrt{n}
  3. Apply Delta Method: SE(g(θ^))=g(θ^)×SE(θ^)\text{SE}(g(\hat{\theta})) = |g'(\hat{\theta})| \times \text{SE}(\hat{\theta})
  4. Construct interval: g(θ^)±z×SE(g(θ^))g(\hat{\theta}) \pm z^* \times \text{SE}(g(\hat{\theta}))

Interactive: CI Constructor

Use this calculator to construct confidence intervals for various transformations:


Second-Order Delta Method

When First-Order Fails

The standard Delta Method requires g(θ)0g'(\theta) \neq 0. But what if the derivative is zero at the true parameter value?

Consider g(x)=x2g(x) = x^2 when θ=0\theta = 0. We have g(0)=0g'(0) = 0, so the first-order approximation gives zero variance—clearly wrong!

Second-Order Delta Method: When g(θ)=0g'(\theta) = 0 but g(θ)0g''(\theta) \neq 0, use the second-order Taylor expansion:g(θ^n)g(θ)12g(θ)(θ^nθ)2g(\hat{\theta}_n) - g(\theta) \approx \frac{1}{2} g''(\theta) (\hat{\theta}_n - \theta)^2This leads to:n(g(θ^n)g(θ))dσ22g(θ)χ12n(g(\hat{\theta}_n) - g(\theta)) \xrightarrow{d} \frac{\sigma^2}{2} g''(\theta) \chi^2_1Note the χ2\chi^2 distribution, not normal!
When to Use Second-Order:
  • Testing if a parameter equals a boundary value (e.g., variance = 0)
  • Functions symmetric around the true parameter
  • Quadratic functions evaluated at the vertex

Real-World Examples

Example 1: Odds Ratio in Clinical Trials

In a randomized clinical trial, we estimate the probability of recovery with treatment (pT=0.7p_T = 0.7) vs placebo (pC=0.5p_C = 0.5). The odds ratio is:

OR=pT/(1pT)pC/(1pC)=0.7/0.30.5/0.5=2.33\text{OR} = \frac{p_T/(1-p_T)}{p_C/(1-p_C)} = \frac{0.7/0.3}{0.5/0.5} = 2.33

To get a confidence interval for the odds ratio, we use the log-odds ratio:

ln(OR)=ln(pT)ln(1pT)ln(pC)+ln(1pC)\ln(\text{OR}) = \ln(p_T) - \ln(1-p_T) - \ln(p_C) + \ln(1-p_C)

By the Delta Method, with g(p)=ln(p/(1p))g(p) = \ln(p/(1-p)) having derivative g(p)=1/(p(1p))g'(p) = 1/(p(1-p)):

Var(ln(OR))1nTpT(1pT)+1nCpC(1pC)\text{Var}(\ln(\text{OR})) \approx \frac{1}{n_T p_T(1-p_T)} + \frac{1}{n_C p_C(1-p_C)}

This formula is standard in epidemiology and clinical research.

Example 2: Coefficient of Variation

The coefficient of variation CV=σ/μCV = \sigma/\mu measures relative variability. To estimate it, we use CV^=s/Xˉ\widehat{CV} = s/\bar{X}.

Using the multivariate Delta Method with g(μ,σ)=σ/μg(\mu, \sigma) = \sigma/\mu:

Var(CV^)1n[σ2μ4Var(Xˉ)+1μ2Var(s)+2σμ3Cov(Xˉ,s)]\text{Var}(\widehat{CV}) \approx \frac{1}{n}\left[\frac{\sigma^2}{\mu^4}\text{Var}(\bar{X}) + \frac{1}{\mu^2}\text{Var}(s) + \frac{2\sigma}{\mu^3}\text{Cov}(\bar{X}, s)\right]

This is essential for quality control and reliability engineering.

Example 3: Ratio Estimators in Surveys

In survey sampling, we often estimate ratios like average income per household:

R^=XiYi=XˉYˉ×n\hat{R} = \frac{\sum X_i}{\sum Y_i} = \frac{\bar{X}}{\bar{Y}} \times n

The Delta Method gives the variance formula that accounts for the correlation between numerator and denominator—crucial for accurate margin-of-error calculations.


AI/ML Applications

Error Propagation in Neural Networks

Consider a neural network layer: z=Wx+bz = Wx + b followed by activation a=σ(z)a = \sigma(z). If the input xx has uncertainty (covariance Σx\Sigma_x), what is the uncertainty in the output?

Delta Method for Neural Nets:ΣzWΣxWT\Sigma_z \approx W \Sigma_x W^TΣadiag(σ(z))2Σz\Sigma_a \approx \text{diag}(\sigma'(z))^2 \cdot \Sigma_zwhere σ(z)\sigma'(z) is the activation derivative.

This is exactly how uncertainty propagates through networks! The derivative of the activation (sigmoid, tanh, ReLU) determines how much uncertainty passes through each layer.

Uncertainty Quantification

Modern ML increasingly requires calibrated uncertainty estimates. The Delta Method provides a principled way to:

  • Transform logits to probabilities: If logit zz has variance σz2\sigma^2_z, then p=sigmoid(z)p = \text{sigmoid}(z) has variance approximately [p(1p)]2σz2[p(1-p)]^2 \sigma^2_z
  • Propagate uncertainty through post-processing: Any differentiable transformation of model outputs
  • Compute confidence intervals for predictions: Essential for safety-critical applications

Connection to Fisher Information

The Delta Method connects beautifully to the Fisher Information and the Cramér-Rao bound:

Fisher Information Transformation: If I(θ)I(\theta) is the Fisher information for θ\theta, then the Fisher information for η=g(θ)\eta = g(\theta) is:I(η)=I(θ)/[g(θ)]2I(\eta) = I(\theta) / [g'(\theta)]^2This is the inverse of the Delta Method variance formula!

Implications for optimization:

  • Natural gradient descent uses Fisher information as a metric
  • Reparametrizations affect optimization geometry
  • The Delta Method explains why some parametrizations train better than others

Python Implementation

Here is a comprehensive Python implementation of the Delta Method, including univariate, multivariate, and validation functions:

Delta Method: Complete Python Implementation
🐍delta_method.py
1NumPy Import

NumPy provides efficient array operations for numerical computations and simulations.

5Delta Method SE Function

This is the core Delta Method formula: SE(g(X̄)) = |g'(μ)| × SE(X̄). The absolute value ensures we get a non-negative standard error.

EXAMPLE
For g(x) = sqrt(x) at mean 100: g'(100) = 0.05, so SE(sqrt(X̄)) = 0.05 × SE(X̄)
24SE Formula

The key formula: take the absolute value of the derivative at the mean, multiply by the SE of the sample mean. This is the heart of the Delta Method.

26CI Construction

Building confidence intervals using Delta Method. First compute g(X̄), then use g'(μ) to find the SE of g(X̄).

44Point Estimate

The point estimate for g(μ) is simply g(X̄) - we plug the sample mean into the transformation function.

47Delta Method SE

Apply the Delta Method to get the standard error of the transformed estimator.

58Multivariate Extension

For functions of multiple variables, we use the gradient ∇g instead of a single derivative. The variance formula becomes Var(g) = ∇gᵀ Σ ∇g.

EXAMPLE
For g(x,y) = x/y: ∇g = (1/y, -x/y²)
77Gradient-Covariance Product

This is the multivariate Delta Method formula: Var(g) = ∇gᵀ Σ ∇g, where Σ is the covariance matrix of the sample means.

80Ratio Estimator

Ratio estimators are extremely common (e.g., rate ratios, price-to-earnings). The Delta Method gives us the variance formula directly.

86Ratio Gradient

For g(x,y) = x/y: ∂g/∂x = 1/y and ∂g/∂y = -x/y². These partial derivatives capture how the ratio changes with each variable.

102Log Proportion CI

A practical example: CI for log(p). This is useful because log-transformed CIs have better properties (e.g., staying within [0,1] after back-transform).

114Variance of Log

For g(p) = log(p), g'(p) = 1/p. So Var(log(p̂)) = (1/p)² × p(1-p)/n = (1-p)/(np).

127Validation Function

Always validate the Delta Method approximation against simulation! This function compares the theoretical SE to the empirical SE from Monte Carlo.

139Simulation Comparison

We simulate many sample means, transform each one, and compute the empirical standard deviation. This should match the Delta Method prediction.

201 lines without explanation
1import numpy as np
2from scipy import stats
3from typing import Callable, Tuple, Optional
4import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
5
6def delta_method_se(
7    mean: float,
8    se_mean: float,
9    g_prime: Callable[[float], float]
10) -> float:
11    """
12    Compute standard error of g(X̄) using the Delta Method.
13
14    Parameters:
15    -----------
16    mean : float
17        Sample mean (point estimate of μ)
18    se_mean : float
19        Standard error of the sample mean (σ/√n)
20    g_prime : callable
21        First derivative of the transformation g
22
23    Returns:
24    --------
25    Standard error of g(X̄)
26
27    Formula: SE(g(X̄)) = |g'(μ)| × SE(X̄)
28    """
29    return abs(g_prime(mean)) * se_mean
30
31def delta_method_ci(
32    mean: float,
33    se_mean: float,
34    g: Callable[[float], float],
35    g_prime: Callable[[float], float],
36    confidence: float = 0.95
37) -> Tuple[float, float, float]:
38    """
39    Construct confidence interval for g(μ) using Delta Method.
40
41    Parameters:
42    -----------
43    mean : sample mean
44    se_mean : standard error of sample mean
45    g : transformation function
46    g_prime : derivative of g
47    confidence : confidence level (default 0.95)
48
49    Returns:
50    --------
51    (lower_bound, point_estimate, upper_bound)
52    """
53    # Point estimate
54    point_estimate = g(mean)
55
56    # Delta method standard error
57    se_g = delta_method_se(mean, se_mean, g_prime)
58
59    # Z-value for confidence level
60    alpha = 1 - confidence
61    z_value = stats.norm.ppf(1 - alpha / 2)
62
63    # Confidence interval
64    margin_of_error = z_value * se_g
65    lower = point_estimate - margin_of_error
66    upper = point_estimate + margin_of_error
67
68    return (lower, point_estimate, upper)
69
70def multivariate_delta_method(
71    means: np.ndarray,
72    cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
73    gradient: np.ndarray
74) -> float:
75    """
76    Compute variance of g(X̄) for multivariate case.
77
78    Parameters:
79    -----------
80    means : array of sample means [X̄, Ȳ, ...]
81    cov_matrix : covariance matrix of the sample means
82    gradient : gradient vector ∇g evaluated at means
83
84    Returns:
85    --------
86    Variance of g(X̄, Ȳ, ...)
87
88    Formula: Var(g) = ∇g^T Σ ∇g
89    """
90    gradient = np.array(gradient).reshape(-1, 1)
91    variance = gradient.T @ cov_matrix @ gradient
92    return float(variance)
93
94def ratio_estimator_variance(
95    mean_x: float, mean_y: float,
96    var_x: float, var_y: float,
97    cov_xy: float, n: int
98) -> float:
99    """
100    Variance of ratio estimator X̄/Ȳ using Delta Method.
101
102    For g(x, y) = x/y:
103    ∇g = (1/y, -x/y²)
104
105    Var(X̄/Ȳ) = (1/n) × (1/μy²)[σx² + (μx/μy)²σy² - 2(μx/μy)σxy]
106    """
107    # Gradient at the means
108    dg_dx = 1 / mean_y
109    dg_dy = -mean_x / (mean_y ** 2)
110
111    # Variance formula
112    var_ratio = (dg_dx**2 * var_x +
113                 dg_dy**2 * var_y +
114                 2 * dg_dx * dg_dy * cov_xy) / n
115
116    return var_ratio
117
118# Example: Log transformation for proportions
119def log_proportion_ci(
120    successes: int,
121    trials: int,
122    confidence: float = 0.95
123) -> Tuple[float, float, float]:
124    """
125    CI for log(p) using Delta Method where p = successes/trials.
126
127    For g(p) = log(p), g'(p) = 1/p
128    Var(p̂) = p(1-p)/n
129    Var(log(p̂)) ≈ (1/p)² × p(1-p)/n = (1-p)/(np)
130    """
131    p_hat = successes / trials
132    n = trials
133
134    # Delta method variance
135    var_log_p = (1 - p_hat) / (n * p_hat)
136    se_log_p = np.sqrt(var_log_p)
137
138    # Confidence interval for log(p)
139    z = stats.norm.ppf(1 - (1 - confidence) / 2)
140    log_p_hat = np.log(p_hat)
141
142    lower = log_p_hat - z * se_log_p
143    upper = log_p_hat + z * se_log_p
144
145    # Back-transform to get CI for p
146    return (np.exp(lower), p_hat, np.exp(upper))
147
148# Demonstration: Compare Delta Method to Simulation
149def validate_delta_method(
150    g: Callable,
151    g_prime: Callable,
152    true_mean: float,
153    true_var: float,
154    n: int = 100,
155    num_simulations: int = 10000
156) -> dict:
157    """
158    Validate Delta Method by comparing to simulation.
159    """
160    # Delta method prediction
161    se_xbar = np.sqrt(true_var / n)
162    delta_se = delta_method_se(true_mean, se_xbar, g_prime)
163
164    # Simulation
165    sample_means = np.random.normal(true_mean, np.sqrt(true_var),
166                                     (num_simulations, n)).mean(axis=1)
167    transformed = np.array([g(xbar) for xbar in sample_means])
168    sim_se = np.std(transformed)
169
170    return {
171        'delta_method_se': delta_se,
172        'simulation_se': sim_se,
173        'relative_error': abs(delta_se - sim_se) / sim_se * 100,
174        'n': n,
175        'num_simulations': num_simulations
176    }
177
178# Example usage
179if __name__ == "__main__":
180    # Example 1: Square root transformation
181    print("=== Square Root Transformation ===")
182    mean, sd, n = 100, 15, 50
183    se_mean = sd / np.sqrt(n)
184
185    g = np.sqrt
186    g_prime = lambda x: 0.5 / np.sqrt(x)
187
188    ci = delta_method_ci(mean, se_mean, g, g_prime)
189    print(f"Sample mean: {mean}, SE: {se_mean:.4f}")
190    print(f"95% CI for sqrt(μ): [{ci[0]:.4f}, {ci[2]:.4f}]")
191    print(f"Point estimate: {ci[1]:.4f}")
192
193    # Example 2: Ratio estimator
194    print("\n=== Ratio Estimator ===")
195    mu_x, mu_y = 10, 5
196    var_x, var_y, cov_xy = 2, 1, 0.5
197    n = 100
198
199    var_ratio = ratio_estimator_variance(mu_x, mu_y, var_x, var_y, cov_xy, n)
200    print(f"Ratio estimate: {mu_x/mu_y:.4f}")
201    print(f"Variance of ratio: {var_ratio:.6f}")
202    print(f"SE of ratio: {np.sqrt(var_ratio):.4f}")
203
204    # Example 3: Validation
205    print("\n=== Delta Method Validation ===")
206    results = validate_delta_method(
207        g=np.log,
208        g_prime=lambda x: 1/x,
209        true_mean=5,
210        true_var=1,
211        n=100
212    )
213    print(f"Delta Method SE: {results['delta_method_se']:.4f}")
214    print(f"Simulation SE: {results['simulation_se']:.4f}")
215    print(f"Relative Error: {results['relative_error']:.2f}%")
Validation is Key: Always validate your Delta Method calculations against simulation, especially for small sample sizes or highly nonlinear transformations. Thevalidate_delta_methodfunction shows how to do this.

Common Mistakes


Test Your Understanding


Summary

Key Takeaways
  • The Delta Method approximates the variance of g(θ^)g(\hat{\theta}) as [g(θ)]2Var(θ^)[g'(\theta)]^2 \text{Var}(\hat{\theta})
  • It relies on Taylor expansion: near the mean, nonlinear functions are approximately linear
  • For multivariate functions, use the gradient:Var(g)=gTΣg\text{Var}(g) = \nabla g^T \Sigma \nabla g
  • The method requires g(μ)0g'(\mu) \neq 0; otherwise use the second-order Delta Method
  • Applications abound: confidence intervals for odds ratios, propagation of uncertainty in neural networks, Fisher information transformations
  • Always validate against simulation for small samples or highly nonlinear transformations

The Delta Method is one of the most practical tools in a statistician's arsenal. It bridges the gap between estimators and functions of estimators, allowing us to quantify uncertainty for any differentiable transformation. In machine learning, it underpins uncertainty propagation, calibration, and the deep connections between optimization geometry and statistical efficiency.

Connection to Earlier Material: The Delta Method works because of the Central Limit Theorem—the sample mean (and MLEs) converge to normal distributions. The next section covers the Berry-Esseen Theorem, which quantifies how fast this convergence happens.
Loading comments...